Choose the right companies. Keep them moving.
Filter new opportunities before the first call, then keep checking the companies you backed as markets, AI and next-round expectations move around them.
Forty minutes to learn it was never in range.
The waste is not the cheque you did not write. It is the calls that could not have gone anywhere.
- Half an hour in before the sector or stage turns out to be wrong
- Founders who cannot explain dilution or the next round bar
- Decks written to impress rather than to be checked
- A checklist from 2015 that says nothing about AI exposure
- Out-of-range companies never reach your list
- A structured read waiting before the first call
- Every claim traced to the founder's own document, or flagged
- AI substitution risk and copy time checked on every project
Know what is slipping before the next round exposes it.
A new score alone is not enough. Portfolio Health tells you what changed, why it matters, and what the company can do next.
Not “would I invest?”
“What is going wrong now, and how do we fix it?”
Built around fresh evidence
Upload a new update
Add the latest deck, financials or operating data, then compare the result with prior reviews.
Ask the founder for it
Request updated material directly. You are notified when it arrives.
Keep the diagnosis private
The founder does not see your health report. Unsupported judgements are flagged, not presented as facts.
The full investment cycle, in one place.
Deal flow inside your range
Pick your sectors, stages and cheque size once. Everything outside it stays out of your list.
A deal room only you can see
Upload the decks you receive elsewhere, keep private notes, and score them the same way. No founder and no other member can see it.
Founder invites
Send a founder you met elsewhere one link that puts their material straight into the platform.
Portfolio Health
Re-read companies you already backed, track score changes, and act on the risks that could block their next round.
Enough to decide whether to take the call.
- Sector and stage specific scoring
A climate hardware pre-seed is not judged against a SaaS checklist. Each rubric is written for its own kind of company.
- Conclusions you can trace
Every judgement cites the founder's material. Anything unsupported is flagged and left out of the score.
- The AI-era questions asked upfront
Whether a large model could absorb it, how long a copy would take, what the company is actually accumulating, and whether the raise is spent sensibly.
- A diligence question list
The gaps worth pressing on, plus the founder's own written response where they have given one.
- A valuation sandbox
Test revenue, margin, growth and multiple assumptions against the current and next round. Your assumptions, clearly separated from the founder's facts.
Reviewed by a person, not a form.
- 1
Create your account
Name, email and password. Confirm your email to continue.
- 2
Choose Investor
Complete the investor application here on the site. It takes a few minutes.
- 3
Pending review
A person reviews it. Your status stays visible in your profile the whole time.
- 4
Active
The member area unlocks: matched deal flow, your private room and founder invites.
Scores support judgement. They are not investment advice, and members still read the material and meet the team.
We give you the evidence. The judgement stays yours.
This platform does not tell you what to invest in and it never will. It reads the material carefully, shows you what is actually supported, marks what is not, and hands you the questions still worth asking.
It also does not exist to reject founders. A low score comes with a repair list, and most of the companies you see here have already been through one round of that. What reaches you is better material than what would have reached you otherwise.
A membership is worth having because of what it keeps out of your inbox, not what it puts in.